ELAYAVOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,KANNUR vs. ITO, WARD 1 & TPS, KANNUR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 114/COCH/2025Status: DisposedITAT Cochin23 June 2025AY 2018-19Bench: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO (Accountant Member), SHRI PRAKASH CHAND YADAV (Judicial Member)2 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal remitted both appeals back to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision. The Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to decide the cases on merits, ensuring that the assessee is provided a meaningful opportunity of being heard before passing any order.

What were the facts?

The assessee, Elayavoor Service Co-operative Bank Ltd., filed appeals against ex-parte orders passed by the CIT(A) for AY 2018-19, which pertained to both quantum of assessment and penalty under Section 270A. The CIT(A) had issued four hearing notices, but the orders did not confirm proper service of these notices to the assessee, leading to orders passed without considering the merits of the case.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) was justified in passing ex-parte orders without ensuring proper service of hearing notices and providing a meaningful opportunity to the assessee to present its case.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 270A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH:COCHIN

Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO & SHRI PRAKASH CHAND YADAV

For Appellant: Shri Akhil Shaji, A.R
For Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Hearing: 29.05.2025Pronounced: 23.06.2025

Date of Hearing : 29.05.2025 Date of Pronouncement : 23.06.2025 O R D E R PERPRAKASH CHAND YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER:

Present appeals of the assessee are arising from the orders of ld. CIT(A) dated 17.12.2024 having DIN & Order No.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-25/1071303667(1) and relates to the AY 2018-19 (Penalty appeal) and dated 6.12.2024 having DIN & Order no.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-25/1070979690(1) for the AY 2018-19.

2.

At the outset, we observe that the ld. CIT(A) has passed the orders ex-parte without considering the merits of the case. In these two appeals, one appeal related to quantum and one appeal related to penalty u/s 270A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “The Act”).

& 115/Coch/2025 Elayavoor Service Co-operative Bank Ltd., Kannur Page 2 of 2 3. At the outset, ld. Counsel for the assessee crave for one more opportunity before ld. CIT(A).

4.

Ld. D.R. relied upon the orders of authorities below.

5.

After considering the rival submissions and perusing the materials available on record, we observe that the ld. CIT(A) has simply issued four notices of hearing to the assessee. Order of ld. CIT(A) is silent on the aspect of service of these notices to the assessee. Therefore, in the interest of justice, we remit these appeals to the file of ld. CIT(A) to decide afresh in accordance with law. Needless to say, that ld. CIT(A) will grant meaningful opportunity to the assessee before passing any order.

60.

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 23rd Jun, 2025

More judgments on Section 270A

All 4,156 judgments and leading authorities on Section 270A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →