EDASSERI SMARAKA SAMITHI,THRISSUR vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), KOCHI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found the CIT (Exemption)'s order cryptic and observed that the assessee was not given a proper opportunity. Consequently, the matter was restored to the CIT (Exemption) for fresh consideration, with directions to provide the assessee with a meaningful opportunity.
What were the facts?
The assessee, already approved under Section 12A, was refused approval under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act by the CIT (Exemption). The assessee contended that this refusal was based on a cryptic order and lacked a meaningful opportunity to be heard.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT (Exemption) was justified in refusing Section 80G approval through a cryptic order without providing a meaningful opportunity to the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH:COCHIN
Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO & SHRI PRAKASH CHAND YADAV
Date of Hearing : 29.05.2025 Date of Pronouncement : 23.06.2025 O R D E R PERPRAKASH CHAND YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
Present appeal of the assessee is arising from the order of ld. CIT(Exemption) dated 4.12.2024 having DIN & Order No.ITBA/EXM/F/EXM45/2024-25/1070901021(1) and relates to the AY 2025-26.
At the outset, ld. Counsel for the assessee pointed out that assessee has been given approval u/s 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “The Act”) by the Income Tax department. However, grant of approval u/s 80G of the Act has been refused without providing meaningful opportunity to the assessee.
Ld. D.R. relied upon the orders of authorities below.
Edasseri Smaraka Samithi Thrissur Page 2 of 2 4. After considering the rival submissions, we observe that the ld. CIT(Exemption) while dismissing the application of the assessee for grant of approval u/s 80G of the Act has passed a very cryptic order and had dismissed the application of the assessee making certain observations, which according to the assessee are contrary to the facts of the case. Therefore, considering the totality of the facts, we are of the view that this matter requires fresh consideration at the end of ld. CIT(Exemption). In view of this, we restore this matter to the file of ld. CIT(Exemption) for deciding afresh. Needless to say, that ld. CIT(Exemption) will grant meaningful opportunity to the assessee.
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 23rd Jun, 2025
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026