MARY MATHA PROVINCE OF VINCENTIAN CONGREGATION,ANGAMALY vs. DCIT, EXEMPTION CIRCLE, KOCHI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found itself unable to discern the reasoning of the lower authorities for the disallowance of expenditure. Consequently, the matter was set aside back to the AO for de novo adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a charitable religious trust, filed a return declaring nil income after claiming exemption u/s. 11. The AO disallowed expenditure incurred outside India for acquiring knowledge, treating it as income. This disallowance was confirmed by the CIT(A).
What were the issues?
Whether expenditure incurred outside India for acquiring knowledge can be disallowed as a deduction.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH
Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, AM
O R D E R This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the ADDL/JCIT(A)-5, Delhi [CIT(A)] dated 21.03.2025 for Assessment Year (AY) 2012-13.
Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a charitable religious trust enjoying 12AA registration. The return of income for the AY 2012-13 was filed on 31/01/2013 declaring nil income after claiming exemption u/s. 11 of the Act. Against the said return of income, assessment was completed by the AO vide order dated 21/07/2014 passed u/s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for Mary Matha Province of Vincentian Congregation short, 'the Act') at a total income of Rs. 21,54,068/-. While doing so, the AO has disallowed expenditure of Rs. 21,54,068/- incurred outside India for the purpose of acquiring knowledge etc. by holding that expenditure incurred outside India cannot be allowed as a deduction.
Being aggrieved, an appeal was filed before the CIT(A), who vide the impugned order confirmed the action of the AO.
Being aggrieved, the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal in the present appeal.
I have heard and carefully perused the material on record.
From reading of the order of AO as well as the order of Ld.CIT(A), I am unable to discern the reasoning of the lower authorities for disallowance of expenditure. Therefore, I set aside the matter back to the file of AO for denovo adjudication in accordance with law after affording reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
Order pronounced in the open court on 31st July, 2025.
More judgments on Section 11
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mata Lachmi Rotary Charitable Society… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward - 1…ITA 310/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 531/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 530/NAG/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Govindjee Dairy Milk Private Limited vs. Central Goods And Services TaxRajasthan · 27 Oct 2026