MANAPPURAM FINANCE LIMITED,THRISSUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 1(1), THRISSUR
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal observed that the current appeal was a duplicate of another appeal already listed for hearing. The earlier appeal was scheduled to be heard on 28.02.2024.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Manappuram Finnace Limited, filed an appeal against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi. The appeal pertains to Assessment Year 2016-17. The assessee was represented by Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal is maintainable as a duplicate filing.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH
Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, AM & SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY, JM
O R D E R Per: Inturi Rama Rao, AM This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi dated 30.05.2025 for Assessment Year (AY) 2016-17.
At the outset, it is found from record that this appeal is duplicate of appeal in which is already posted for hearing by this Tribunal on 28.02.2024. Therefore, this appeal is dismissed as infructuous.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026