SEDU RAM YADAV,JAIPUR vs. ACIT-CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the agricultural land sold by the assessee was not a capital asset. Consequently, no capital gains tax liability could be assessed.
What were the facts?
The appellant sold agricultural land. The Assessing Officer treated it as a capital asset and levied capital gains tax. The appellant contended that agricultural land is not a capital asset.
What were the issues?
Whether agricultural land is a 'capital asset' under the Income Tax Act for the purpose of capital gains tax.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
As we have held that the agricultural land sold by the assessee was not a capital asset and hence no capital gain tax liability can be assessed, the other grounds of appeal have become infructuous on which we are not rendering our opinion. In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
