SRI GOURNIDHI INNOVESTMENT PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O,WARD-1(3), KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal noted that the assessee intended to withdraw the appeal due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The Departmental Representative had no objection to this withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order for AY 2014-15. The assessee did not appear for the hearing. The assessee had opted for the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020' and intended to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the withdrawal of the appeal by the assessee due to opting for a tax settlement scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA BENCH “SMC” KOLKATA
Before: Shri SANJAY GARG
आदेश /O R D E R The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 27.04.2017 of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-10, Kolkata [hereinafter referred to as ‘CIT(A)’].
None has put in appearance on behalf of the assessee, hence, I dispose of this case ex parte qua the assessee after hearing the Ld. DR. Sri Gournidhi Innovestment Pvt. Vs. ITO Wd-1(3), Kol Page 2 3. An application has been moved stating that since the assessee has opted for ‘Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020’ and therefore, it intends to withdraw the present appeal. The Ld. DR has no objection for the said withdrawal.
In view of the above, the appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed as ‘Withdrawn’.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026