AJAY YADAV,JAIPUR vs. ITO WD 1(2), JPR, JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal was hearing the appeals filed by the assessee. The first ground of appeal mentioned is related to an ex-parte assessment that allegedly violated natural justice and relied on filed returns.
What were the facts?
The assessee has filed two appeals against separate orders from the CIT(A). The appeals pertain to assessment years 2011-12 and 2023-14.
What were the issues?
Whether the ex-parte assessment order was passed in violation of natural justice principles, and whether the assessment should have relied on the filed returns.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,”A” JAIPUR
Before: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA. No.181 & 182/JPR/2025
ORDER PER: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, J.M. Both these appeals have been filed by the assessee against two different orders of the ld. CIT(A) dated 31-01-2024 and 18-11-2022, National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [ hereinafter referred to as (NFAC) ] for the assessment years 2011-12 and 2023-14 raising therein following grounds of appeal.
– A.Y. 2011-12 ‘’Ground 1: Ex-Parte Assessment in Violation of Natural Justice and Reliance on Filed Returns आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”A” JAIPUR Mk0 ,l- lhrky{eh] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh jkBkSM+ deys'k t;UrHkkbZ] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA. No.181 & 182/JPR/2025 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Years : 2011-12 & 2013-14 Shri Ajay Yadav cuke Income Tax Officer, 32BC, Hawa Sadak, Keshav Nagar Vs. Ward -1(2), AJMER ROAD, Jaipur 302 006 Jaipur LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AAEPY 6857 B vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Shri Amit Kumar Jain, CA jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue by : Mrs. Anita Rinesh, JCIT-DR lquokbZ dh rkjh[k@ Date of Hearing : 8/04/2025 mn?kks"k.kk dh rkjh[k@Date of Pronouncement : 07 /05/2025 vkns'k@ ORDER PER: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, J.M. Both these appeals have been filed by the assessee against two different orders of the ld. CIT(A) dated 31-01-2024 and 18-11-2022, National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [ hereinafter referred to as (NFAC) ] for the assessment years 2011-12 and 2023-14 raising therein following grounds of appeal.
– A.Y. 2011-12 ‘’Ground 1: Ex-Parte Assessment in Violation of Natural Justice and Reliance on Filed Returns
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Fasil Hussain Shah vs. Ut Of J And K Th Commissioner Secretary TO Government Finance Department And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Sukant Kumar vs. Union Of INDIA And 6 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026