DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. MR. ROHIT KUMAR BANSAL, GURGAON
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the appeal filed by the Revenue was not maintainable due to low tax effect, as per CBDT Circular No. 17/2019, which revised the monetary limit for filing appeals.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against an order of the CIT(A) for AY 2012-13. The assessee's representative contended that the appeal should be dismissed due to low tax effect as per CBDT Circular No. 17/2019.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal is maintainable before the Tribunal considering the low tax effect as per the latest CBDT circular.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘D’ : NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI N.K. BILLAIYA & SHRI KULDIP SINGH
PER KULDIP SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER :
Appellant, Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle 13(1), New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as ‘the revenue’) by filing the present appeal sought to set aside the impugned order dated 25.01.2016 passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)- 5, New Delhi qua the assessment years 2012-13.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026