ANAND KUMAR JAIN ,KOTA vs. ITO WD-2(1), KOTA, KOTA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the order of the CIT(A) and restored the matter for fresh decision, granting the assessee another opportunity to be heard. The assessee was burdened with costs of Rs. 6,000/- for non-compliance.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was dismissed by the CIT(A) for Assessment Year 2023-24. The Assessing Officer made additions for unexplained money and disallowance of interest. The assessee failed to appear or submit responses during the assessment and appellate proceedings.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed due to non-appearance of the assessee, or whether the assessee should be granted another opportunity to be heard.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 250,Section 143(3),Section 234A,Section 234B,Section 234C,Section 234D,Section 156,Section 143(2),Section 142(1),Section 133(6),Section 24(b),Section 139(4),Section 69A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,”B-Bench” JAIPUR
Before: SHRIGAGAN GOYAL, AM& SHRI NARINDER KUMAR, JM
In the given situation, having regard to the gravity of the issues involved, and also that the assessee did not participate in the appellate proceedings despite notices, this appeal is disposed of, for statistical purpose and while setting aside the impugned order, passed by Learned CIT(A), NFAC the matter is restored to the files of Learned CIT(A), NFAC for decision afresh, after providing another opportunity to the appellant of being heard.
Anand Kumar Jain, Kota. As regards non compliance by the assessee with the four notices issued u/s 250 of the Act, the assessee-appellant is burdened with costs of Rs. 6,000/-. Costs to be deposited in “Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund” and receipt to be produced before Learned CIT(A) before the commencement of proceedings on restoration of the matter there. File be consigned to the record room after the needful is done by the office. Order pronounced in the open court on 10/11/2025.
More judgments on Section 234A
- Vikas Ashokkumar Masand, Ahmedabad vs The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 3130/AHD/2026[A.Y. 2017-18]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Sarvjeet Singh Through Legal Heir Manjit… vs ITO Ward 1(1), AlwarITA 355/JPR/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026