Facts
The assessee applied for registration under Section 10(23C)(vi) of the Income Tax Act, which was initially rejected. The ITAT, Agra, had previously ruled that the assessee was eligible for recognition under this section. The CIT's order was again challenged.
Held
The Tribunal held that the CIT (Exemptions) had incorrectly applied Sections 11 and 12 of the Act. The appeal was allowed and the order was set aside, with directions to pass a fresh order considering Section 10(23C)(vi) and the previous ITAT ruling.
Key Issues
Whether the CIT erred in applying Sections 11 and 12 of the Act when the application was specifically for registration under Section 10(23C)(vi).
Sections Cited
10(23C)(vi), 11, 12, 12A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, LUCKNOW BENCH ‘A’, LUCKNOW
Before: SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRA & SHRI SUBHASH MALGURIA
2018-19 against impugned order dated 29/11/2023 (DIN & Order No.ITBA/EXM/F/EXM41/2023-24/1058329611(1) of Commissioner of Income Tax [“CIT” for short].
The facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee had filed an application on 30/09/2018 for registration u/s 10(23C)(vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act” for short) with the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Lucknow. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Lucknow, vide order dated 30/09/2019 rejected the registration sought by the assessee. Aggrieved by the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Lucknow, the assessee filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Agra. The ITAT, vide dated 17/03/2020 observed that assessee was existing for solely educational purposes and not for the purpose of profit, hence the assessee is entitled to recognition under section 10(23C)(vi) of the Act. Accordingly, complying the judgment of ITAT, Agra, the assessee society was granted registration with the condition that provisions of sections 11 & 12 shall apply in the case of the assessee from the assessment year 2019-20. Being aggrieved with the order passed by learned CIT (Exemptions), Lucknow, the assessee has filed this appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
At the time of hearing, there was no representation from assessee’s side. In absence of any representation from assessee’s side, the learned CIT, (D.R.) was heard and the materials available on record were perused.
We have heard learned CIT (D.R.) and perused the materials available on record. The objection of the assessee before us is that the learned CIT (Exemptions) has incorrectly acknowledged both section 20(23C)(vi) and the provisions of section 11 and 12 of the Act. The provisions of section 11 and 12 are applicable only to those entities registered under section 12A of the Act whereas the assessee vide its application dated 30/09/2018 had requested for registration u/s 20(23C)(vi) of the Act. The Agra Bench of the Tribunal has observed that the assessee is entitled to recognition under section 20(23C)(vi) of the Act. In view of the foregoing, the order dated 29/11/2023 passed by the learned CIT (Exemptions), Lucknow is set aside and restored back to his file with the direction to pass order afresh keeping in view the provisions of section 20(23C)(vi) and the direction of the Agra Bench of the Tribunal vide order dated 17/03/2020, after providing reasonable opportunity of being heard to assessee.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes.
(Order pronounced in the open court on 05/06/2025)