ST MARKS SCHOOL SOCIETY,JHANSI vs. CIT, EXEMPTIONS
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT (Exemptions) had incorrectly applied Sections 11 and 12 of the Act. The appeal was allowed and the order was set aside, with directions to pass a fresh order considering Section 10(23C)(vi) and the previous ITAT ruling.
What were the facts?
The assessee applied for registration under Section 10(23C)(vi) of the Income Tax Act, which was initially rejected. The ITAT, Agra, had previously ruled that the assessee was eligible for recognition under this section. The CIT's order was again challenged.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT erred in applying Sections 11 and 12 of the Act when the application was specifically for registration under Section 10(23C)(vi).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, LUCKNOW BENCH ‘A’, LUCKNOW
Before: SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRA & SHRI SUBHASH MALGURIA
2018-19 against impugned order dated 29/11/2023 (DIN & Order No.ITBA/EXM/F/EXM41/2023-24/1058329611(1) of Commissioner of Income Tax [“CIT” for short].
The facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee had filed an application on 30/09/2018 for registration u/s 10(23C)(vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act” for short) with the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Lucknow. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Lucknow, vide order dated 30/09/2019 rejected the registration sought by the assessee. Aggrieved by the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Lucknow, the assessee filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Agra. The ITAT, vide dated 17/03/2020 observed that assessee was existing for solely educational purposes and not for the purpose of profit, hence the assessee is entitled to recognition under section 10(23C)(vi) of the Act. Accordingly, complying the judgment of ITAT, Agra, the assessee society was granted registration with the condition that provisions of sections 11 & 12 shall apply in the case of the assessee from the assessment year 2019-20. Being aggrieved with the order passed by learned CIT (Exemptions), Lucknow, the assessee has filed this appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
At the time of hearing, there was no representation from assessee’s side. In absence of any representation from assessee’s side, the learned CIT, (D.R.) was heard and the materials available on record were perused.
We have heard learned CIT (D.R.) and perused the materials available on record. The objection of the assessee before us is that the learned CIT (Exemptions) has incorrectly acknowledged both section 20(23C)(vi) and the provisions of section 11 and 12 of the Act. The provisions of section 11 and 12 are applicable only to those entities registered under section 12A of the Act whereas the assessee vide its application dated 30/09/2018 had requested for registration u/s 20(23C)(vi) of the Act. The Agra Bench of the Tribunal has observed that the assessee is entitled to recognition under section 20(23C)(vi) of the Act. In view of the foregoing, the order dated 29/11/2023 passed by the learned CIT (Exemptions), Lucknow is set aside and restored back to his file with the direction to pass order afresh keeping in view the provisions of section 20(23C)(vi) and the direction of the Agra Bench of the Tribunal vide order dated 17/03/2020, after providing reasonable opportunity of being heard to assessee.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes.
(Order pronounced in the open court on 05/06/2025)
More judgments on Section 10(23C)(vi)
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Sri Vijayadurga Educational Society, Kurnool vs Income Tax Officer (Exemptions), TirupatiITA 2006/HYD/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed18 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- DCIT Exemptions Circle 1(1), Kolkata vs South Point Education Society, KolkataITA 2169/KOL/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed11 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Ajanta Educational Trust, Amritsar vs CIT (Exemptions), ChandigarhITA 276/ASR/2026[2027-28]Status: Disposed31 Aug 2026AY 2027-28
- Sunflower Academy of Education… vs DDIT, VisakhapatnamITA 363/VIZ/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed31 Aug 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026