SHRI VINAY KUMAR,CHANDIGARH vs. ACIT, C-2(1), CHANDIGARH
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the withdrawal of the appeal as the Assessing Officer did not object. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order for AY 2011-12. During the hearing, the assessee's counsel moved an application to withdraw the appeal. The issue in the appeal was also raised in another appeal where the assessee had availed the benefit of the VsV Scheme.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed by the assessee should be permitted to be withdrawn.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 06/03/2025 उदघोषणा की तारीख/Date of Pronouncement : 06/03/2025 आदेश/Order PER LALIET KUMAR, J.M: This is an appeal filed by the Assessee against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)-1, Chandigarh dt. 15/03/2019 pertaining to Assessment Year 2011-12. 2. During the course of hearing the Ld. Counsel for the Assessee moved an application to withdraw the appeal, contents of which read as under:
Subject: Prayer for withdrawal of appeal in appeal no. 1367/Chandi/2019 in the case of Sh. Vinay Kumar, PAN: AAUPK1557A, AY 2011-12. Hon'ble Sir, Kindly refer to the matter cited as subject above. In regards to this, it is submitted that the captioned appeal in the case of the assessee pertaining to AY 2011-12, filed by the assessee, is pending before the Hon'ble Bench against the order passed by Id. CIT(A) u/s 154, whereby an addition of Rs. 7,89,600 was made on the basis of market rental value of property. The said issue has also been raised by the assessee in appeal no. 304/Chandi/2016 filed u/s 143(3). However, the assessee has availed the benefit of VsV Scheme in appeal no. 304/Chandi/2016 and accordingly, Form 1 was filed on 26.12.2024 which is pending for rectification with the Id. AO. In view of the above, your honour is most humbly requested to allow withdrawal of above-mentioned appeal in AY 2011-12 filed u/s 154. We will be highly obliged.
Ld. Sr. DR did not object if the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the above the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, appeal of the Assessee is dismissed.
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026