PARAMJIT SINGH, H NO. 208, BAREWAL AWANA, LUDHIANA,PUNJAB vs. THE ASSESSMENT UNIT NFAC DELHI JAO THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-7(1), LUDHIANA, PUNJAB
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal as the dispute was settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. Liberty was granted to revive the appeal if the settlement failed.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against a penalty order for AY 2012-13. The penalty was confirmed by the CIT(A). The assessee had settled the dispute under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to settlement under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, CHANDIGARH
Before: HON’BLE SHRI LALIET KUMAR, JM & HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM
O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member) 1. Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2012-13 arises out of an order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [CIT(A)] dated 26-07-2024 confirming penalty of Rs.40,000/- as levied by Ld. AO u/s. 271(1)(b) vide order dated 05-02-2022.
The Ld. AR, at the outset, sought withdrawal of the captioned appeal on the ground that the assessee has settled the dispute under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 and Form No.2 has already been issued to the assessee which has been placed on record. The withdrawal of appeal has not been objected to by Ld. Sr. DR.
Accepting the prayer of Ld. AR, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn subject to liberty to the assessee to seek revival of the appeal in case the aforesaid resolution fails, for whatever reasons. 4. The appeal of the assessee stand dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced on 16th April, 2025.
More judgments on Section 271(1)(b)
- Navanitbhai Gordhanbhai Bhuva, Surat vs ITO, Ward 3(3)(1), SuratITA 1195/SRT/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Navanitbhai Gordhanbhai Bhuva, Surat vs ITO, Ward 3(3)(1), SuratITA 1194/SRT/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Navanitbhai Gordhanbhai Bhuva, Surat vs ITO, Ward 3(3)(1), SuratITA 1193/SRT/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Laxmi Narain Kesarwani, Delhi vs DCIT, Central Circle-20, New DelhiITA 4432/DEL/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Laxminarain Kesarwani, Delhi vs DCIT, Central Circel-20, New DelhiITA 4431/DEL/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Govindjee Dairy Milk Private Limited vs. Central Goods And Services TaxRajasthan · 27 Oct 2026