GANPATI TOWNSHIPS LIMITED,BATHINDA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, LUDHIANA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, noting that the settlement under the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme' made the appeal infructuous. It was clarified that the appeal could be revived under specific conditions.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The assessee later filed an application to withdraw the appeal, having opted for the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2024'.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme'.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Order Per Bench : Appeal in this case has been filed by the assessee against the order dated 18.02.2024 of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-5, for the Assessment Year 2018-19.
The Ld. Counsel, on behalf of the Assessee, has filed an application dated 17.05.2025 for withdrawal of this appeal on the ground that the Assessee has opted for the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2024’ and sought permission of the Bench to 373-Chd-2024 Ganpati Townships Limited, Bathinda 2 withdraw the aforementioned appeal. Necessary certificate in Form No.2 under Rule 5 has been issued to him which is placed on record.
Considering the prayer of the assessee, this appeal is dismissed as ‘withdrawn’ because in view of this settlement of dispute under 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme', it becomes infructuous. However, it is made clear that in case, on account of some technicalities, assessee fails to avail the full benefit of this Scheme, then both sides will be at liberty to get the appeal revived after filing of application under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act. Such application be filed within due date of limitation provided under this Scheme.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced on 20.05.2025. ( RAJPAL YADAV ) Accountant Member “आर.के.”
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026