KANYA GURUKUL SHIKSHA SAMITI,NILOKHERI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), AMBALA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, granting liberty to the assessee to file a fresh appeal before the CIT(A) within a reasonable time, with a sympathetic consideration for any delay.
What were the facts?
The assessee's return was processed u/s 143(1), followed by rectification u/s 154 and a subsequent first appeal. After set-aside proceedings, the AO re-determined income, leading to the present appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear a direct appeal when the order is appealable before the first appellate authority; and whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, CHANDIGARH
Before: HON’BLE SHRI LALIET KUMAR, JM & HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM
O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member) 1. During hearing of captioned appeal, it transpires that the return of income as filed by the assessee was initially processed u/s 143(1). The assessee filed rectification u/s 154 which was disposed-off by CPC on 15-12-2022. The assessee preferred first appeal against this order which was disposed-off vide order dated 09-09-2024 wherein Ld. AO was directed to allow certain expenditure. In the set-aside proceedings, Ld. AO re-determined income of Rs.19.49 Lacs vide order dated 06-11-2024. Against this order, the assessee has filed present appeal before us. The Ld. Sr. DR has opposed admission of the appeal on the ground that this order is appealable before first appellate authority only and direct appeal do not lie before Tribunal. The Ld. AR could not controvert the same and sought withdrawal of the appeal. A letter to that effect has been placed on record.
In view of aforesaid position, the appeal stand dismissed as withdrawn. However, a liberty is granted to the assessee to file fresh appeal before Ld. CIT(A) within a reasonable time who shall consider the issue of delay sympathetically.
The appeal stand dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced on 02-06-2025.
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026