N.T. BACK OFFICE SERVICES PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 13(1), NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had been granted relief in proceedings related to the impugned order. As the assessee wished to withdraw the appeal and the revenue did not object, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the CIT(A) for the Assessment Year 2010-11. During the hearing, the assessee requested to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn, given the subsequent relief obtained by the assessee in related proceedings.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “E” NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA & SHRI O.P. KANT
PER AMIT SHUKLA, J.M.: The aforesaid appeal has been filed by the assessee against the impugned order dated 16.02.2016 passed by Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-XX, New Delhi for the Assessment Year 2010-11.
During the course of hearing, at the outset, the ld. counsel for the assessee submitted that assessee has been granted relief in the proceedings initiated in consequence to the impugned order passed u/s.263 of the Act; therefore, assessee would like to withdraw the present appeal.
Learned Department Representative did not object if the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the submission of the ld. counsel, we dismiss the appeal of the assessee as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open Court on 7th January, 2020.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026