PUNJAB LAND RECORD SOCIETY,JALANDHAR vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTION) CL.1, CHANDIGARH
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the ld. DR had no objection to the withdrawal request. Considering the facts, the Tribunal allowed the withdrawal application and dismissed the assessee's appeal as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the CIT(A) for assessment year 2022-23. Subsequently, the assessee requested to withdraw the appeal, stating that the demand created under Section 143(3) of the Act had been reduced to NIL by an order passed under Section 154 of the Act.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee should be allowed to withdraw its appeal before the Tribunal, given that the tax demand against it has been subsequently reduced to NIL.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CHANDIGARH
Before: SHRI RAJPAL YADAV & SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL
VIRTUAL HEARING आदेश/ORDER PER RAJPAL YADAV, VP The assessee is in appeal against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [in short ‘the CIT (A)’] dated 16.01.2025 passed for assessment year 2022-23.
The ld. counsel for the assessee has filed an application seeking permission to withdraw the present appeal. The contents of the application are as under :
ITA 418/CHD/2025 A.Y. 2022-23 2 “Above said appeal was fixed for hearing for 08.09.2025 which has been adjourned to 01.12JO2S. It is most humbly submitted feat assessee vide our letter dated 01.09.2025 requested to withdraw the appeal since demand created u/s 143(3) of the Act has been reduced to NTL vide order dated 24.09.2024 u/s 154 of the Act. Our letter dated 01.09.2025 alongwith letter of the assessee towards withdrawal of appeal was sent through mail as well as speed post on 01.09.2025. Under the circumstances, it is most humbly prayed that appeal may kindly be treated as withdrawn & oblige.”
The ld. DR has posed no objection to the request of the assessee.
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026