GANPATRAM DHUDARAMJI PUROHIT,MUMBAI vs ITO WARD 19 (1)(3), MUMBAI

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, MUMBAI

Before: HON’BLE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, JM & HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM

For Appellant: Shri Poojan Mehta-Ld. AR, Shri Smita Verma-Ld. DR

For Respondent: Shri Smita Verma-Ld. DR

आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member):-

At the time of hearing of appeal, Ld. AR submitted that the assessee has already opted for settlement of dispute under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme (VVS Scheme), 2020 and therefore, seeks withdrawal of appeal. The Ld. DR did not object to the same.

In view of foregoing, the appeal stand dismissed as withdrawn, however, with a liberty to assessee to seek restoration of this appeal in case the aforesaid declaration filed under the scheme is not accepted, for whatever reasons. 3. The appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced on 5th April, 2021.

GANPATRAM DHUDARAMJI PUROHIT,MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD 19 (1)(3), MUMBAI