VEGA JEWELLERY,MUMBAI vs ITO 19(3)(5), MUMBAI

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “F” BENCH, MUMBAI

Before: HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VP & HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM

For Appellant: Shri Bharat Shah – Ld. AR

For Respondent: Ms. Usha Gaikwad, Ld. Sr. DR

आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण “एफ” न्यायपीठ म ुंबई में। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “F” BENCH, MUMBAI माननीय श्री महावीर स िंह, उपाध्यक्ष एवुं माननीय श्री मनोज कुमार अग्रवाल ,लेखा दस्य के मक्ष। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VP AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM (Hearing Through Video Conferencing Mode) 1. आयकरअपील िं./ (धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2009-10) M/s Vega Jewellery ITO- 19(3)(5), बिाम/ 101, Shreeji Darshan Mumbai Tata Road, 1 & 2, Opera House Vs. Mumbai-400 004 स्थायीलेखा िं./ जीआइआर िं./ PAN/GIR No. AAEFV-2026-M (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) : Assessee by : Shri Bharat Shah – Ld. AR Revenue by : Ms. Usha Gaikwad, Ld. Sr. DR ुनवाई की तारीख/ : 03/08/2021 Date of Hearing घोषणा की तारीख / : 03/08/2021 Date of Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member)

During hearing of the appeal, Ld. AR submitted that only issue that arises under the appeal is estimated addition on account of alleged bogus purchases. The Ld. AR, drawing attention to the facts of the cases, submitted that estimation of 3% as made by learned CIT(Appeals)—30, Mumbai in order dated 20/03/2017 is on the higher side. No other ground was urged by Ld. AR. The Ld. DR pleaded for dismissal of appeal.

VEGA JEWELLERY,MUMBAI vs. ITO 19(3)(5), MUMBAI