SHRI PRANAY BHARATKUMAR SHAH,AHMEDABAD vs. THE PR. CIT-5, AHMEDABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee requested to withdraw the appeal in light of the settlement scheme. The Departmental Representative raised no objection, and the Tribunal considered the submissions.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-5 under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. During the hearing, the assessee submitted that they opted for settlement under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee can withdraw the appeal due to opting for settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: SHRI T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR & SHRI MAKARAND V. MAHADEOKAR
"ी टी.आर. से""ल कुमार, "ाियक सद" एवं "ी मकरंद वसंत महादेवकर, लेखा सद" के सम"। ] ] BEFORE SHRI T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MAKARAND V. MAHADEOKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं / Year : 2015-16 Shri Pranay Bharatkumar Shah The Pr.CIT-5 बनाम/ 101, Ujas Flat, Ahmedabad – 380 015 v/s. Jain Merchant Society, Paldi Ahmedabad – 380 007 "थायी लेखा सं./PAN: BCBPS 6755 E (अपीलाथ%/ Appellant) (&' यथ%/ Respondent) Assessee by : Withdrawal Application Revenue by : Shri Durga Dutt, CIT-DR सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 03 /04/2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement: 03 /04/2025 आदेश/O R D E R
PER MAKARAND V. MAHADEOKAR, AM:
This appeal filed by the assessee pertains to the Assessment Year (AY) 2015-16 against the order dated 05/05/2020 passed by the Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax-5, Ahmedabad [hereinafter referred to as “CIT(A)”] passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 arising from the assessment order dated 22/12/2017 passed by the Assessing Officer u/s.143 (3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
During the course of hearing before us, on behalf of assessee, through ld.AR of the assessee, vide letter dated 02/04/2025 (kept in file) submitted that the assessee has opted for settlement under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Shri Pranay Bharatkumar Shah vs. The Pr.CIT-5 Asst. Year : 2015-16 Vishwas Scheme, 2024 (DTVSVS) and Form Nos. 2 & 3 have been issued by the competent authority vide Certificate No. 866760341110225 dated 11/02/2025 and Acknowledgement No.903866380170325 respectively. Accordingly, the assessee requested to withdraw the above appeal.
The Departmental Representative (DR) raised no objection. Considering the submissions, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026