MR.MUNIRAJU,BANGALORE vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-3, BANGALORE
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's prayer to withdraw the present appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn based on the submissions made by the assessee's counsel.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order for assessment year 2013-14. A previous appeal for the same assessment year was withdrawn by the assessee as they opted for the Vivad se Vishwas scheme.
What were the issues?
Whether the current appeal becomes infructuous due to the withdrawal of a previous appeal by the assessee under the Vivad se Vishwas scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH : BANGALORE
Before: SHRI.CHANDRA POOJARI & SMT. BEENA PILLAI
Date of Hearing : 17-08-2021 Date of Pronouncement : 18-08-2021 ORDER PER BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Present appeal by the assessee has been filed against order dated 21/3/2018 passed by CIT, Bengaluru-3, Benagaluru for assessment year 2013-14.
The appeal against the order u/s 143(3) r.w.s 263 of the Act for the same asst. year was also pending before this Hon’ble Tribunal in 21/Bang/2020. It has been submitted by the Ld.AR that ITA No.21/Bang/2020 for asst. year 2013-14 stands withdrawn pursuant to assessee opting for VSVS 2020 vide order dated 9/3/2021. It has been thus submitted the present appeal becomes infructuous.
We heard Ld D.R, who did not object to the prayer of the assessee to withdraw the present appeal. Based on the submissions made by Ld.AR, the present appeal is allowed to be withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Shree Construction, Khordha vs. The Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 4 Nov 2026
- Pramod Kumar Behera vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 4 Nov 2026
- Santosh Kumar Pradhan (Late Biswabhar Pradhan) vs. The Chief Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise And Customs, BhubaneswarOrissa · 4 Nov 2026
- Mrs. Sharma Glass And Plywoods vs. The Commercial Tax OfficerKarnataka · 4 Nov 2026
- Sri Mohanraj vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 4 Nov 2026