SAVITABEN BALDEVBHAI PATEL,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-1(1)(3)(PREVIOUSLY WARD-1(2)(4)), AHMEDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee's counsel submitted a letter requesting to withdraw the appeal, and the Revenue's representative had no objection. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the appellate order passed by the CIT(A) which arose from a reassessment order under section 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for AY 2010-11. The assessee subsequently filed a letter requesting to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal can be dismissed as withdrawn upon the assessee's request.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “SMC” BENCH
Before: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha
Assessment Year: 2010-11 Mrs. Savitaben Income Tax Officer, Baldevbhai Patel Jurisdiction A.O. 11, Khadakdhareshwar Vs Ward-1(1)(3), Society, Shahibag, Assessed A.O. Ahmedabad-380002 Ward-1(2)(4), Gujarat Aaykar Bhavan Vejalpur, PAN: APHPP2381K Ahmedabad (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee Represented: Withdrawal Appeal Revenue Represented: Shri Nitin Kulkarni, Sr. D.R. Date of hearing : 20-08-2025 Date of pronouncement : 22-08-2025 आदेश/ORDER PER : T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER:-
This appeal is filed by the Assessee as against the appellate order dated 25.09.2024 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, (in short referred to as “CIT(A)”), arising out of the reassessment order passed under section 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) relating to the Assessment Year 2010-11.
A.Y. 2010-11 Page No 2 Mrs. Savitaben Baldevbhai Patel Vs. ITO
At the outset, Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted vide letter dated 19-08-2025 as follows:
“Sub: Withdrawal of appeal in the case of Mrs. Savitaben Baldevbhai Patel Under the instructions from our client and the appellant Mrs. Savitaben Baldevbhal Patel, we most respectfully submit that the appellant has decided to withdraw her appeal. Accordingly, this is to request you to kindly take note of the above fact and allow the appeal bearing No. ITA 1960/AHD/2024 of the appellant for A.Y.2010-11 to be withdrawn unconditionally. We regret the inconvenience caused to you.”
We find a valid Letter of Authority in favour of the Counsel and Ld. Sr. D.R. appearing for the Revenue has no objection in withdrawal of the appeal.
Recording the same, the appeal filed by the Assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Its Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr The Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026