RESILIENT CONSMECEUTICALS PRIVATE LIMITED,PUNE vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-5, PUNE, PUNE
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the Revenue's representative had no objection to the withdrawal. Consequently, the Tribunal permitted the withdrawal of both appeals.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed two appeals against the orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals). During the hearing, the assessee's AR submitted that they received Form 2 under the VSVS Scheme-2024 and wished to withdraw both appeals.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee is permitted to withdraw their appeals in light of the VSVS Scheme-2024.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCHES “B” :: PUNE
Before: DR.DIPAK P. RIPOTE & SHRI VINAY BHAMORE
ORDER PER DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, AM: These two appeals filed by the assessee against the separate orders of ld.Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)[NFAC] passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961; both dated 29.11.2024 for Assessment Years 2012-13 and 2013-14 respectively.
ITA Nos.248 & 249/PUN/2025 [A]
At the outset of hearing, ld.AR for the assessee submitted that they are in receipt of Form 2 under VSVS Scheme-2024, therefore, assessee intends to withdraw both the appeals. Ld.AR filed written requests(two) for withdrawal as under :
ITA Nos.248 & 249/PUN/2025 [A]
On the other hand, the ld.Departmental Representative(ld.DR) of the Revenue did not object to the contention of the assessee and has no objection if the appeal of assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the above, we permit to withdraw the both appeals of the assessee. Accordingly, grounds of appeal raised by the assessee in both the appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.
ITA Nos.248 & 249/PUN/2025 [A]
In the result, both appeals of the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open Court on 10th March, 2025.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026