RELIANCE INDUTRIES EMP CO. OP. CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.,RAIGAD vs. ITO, WARD 4, PANVEL, PANVEL

PDF · subscribers
ITA 70/PUN/2025Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 March 2025AY 2018-19Bench: DR.MANISH BORAD (Accountant Member), SHRI S.S.VISWANETHRA RAVI (Judicial Member)5 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal condoned the 253-day delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A), considering the prior decision in the assessee's own case and the reasonable cause for the delay. The issues were restored to the CIT(A) for adjudication on merits.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal for AY 2018-19 was dismissed by the CIT(A) as barred by limitation due to a 253-day delay, excluding the COVID-19 period. The assessee sought condonation of delay, citing a previous order where the Tribunal condoned a similar delay.

What were the issues?

Whether the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) can be condoned, and whether the matter should be restored for adjudication on merits.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 250,Section 143(3),Section 143(3A),Section 143(3B),Section 80P,Section 250(6)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCHES “SMC”, PUNE

Before: DR.MANISH BORAD & SHRI S.S.VISWANETHRA RAVI

For Appellant: Shri Kishore Phadke
For Respondent: Shri Manoj Tripathi
Hearing: 18.03.2025Pronounced: 21.03.2025

आदेश / ORDER

PER DR. MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :

1.

The captioned appeal at the instance of assessee pertaining the assessment year 2018-19 is directed against the order dated 05.11.2024 framed by National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi passed u/s.250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ( in short ‘the Act’) which inturn is arising out of the Assessment order dated 13.04.2021 passed u/s.143(3) r.w.s.143(3A) & 143(3B) of the Act.

2.

At the outset, Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that ld.CIT(A) has dismissed the appeal being barred by limitation as the appeal was filed belatedly by 253 days (excluding covid-19 pandemic outbreak period). He further referred to the decision of the Tribunal in assessee’s own case for the A.Y. 2020-21 where also the Tribunal vide order dated 08.01.2025 under similar facts and circumstances has condoned the delay in filing the appeal before the ld.CIT(A). Therefore, a prayer is made to restore the matter back to the file of ld.CIT(A) for necessary adjudication on merit. Ld. Departmental Representative did not oppose the request of restoring the issues on merit to the file of ld.CIT(A) for necessary adjudication.

3.

We have heard both the sides and perused the record placed before us. We observe that the assessee is a Cooperative Society, passed through scrutiny proceedings for the A.Y. 2018- 19, wherein certain additions in the form of disallowance u/s.80P of the Act at Rs.38,63,270/-. Aggrieved assessee preferred an appeal before the ld.CIT(A) but the same was delayed by 253 delay excluding the covid-19 pandemic period and even though the reasons explaining the delay were furnished by the assessee, the ld.CIT(A) did not condone the delay and dismissed the appeal as barred by limitation. We however considering that under similar facts and circumstances this Tribunal has condoned the delay filed before the ld.CIT(A) in assessee’s own case for the A.Y. 2021-22 and considering the reasonable cause which prevented the assessee from filing the appeal within the stipulated time before the ld.CIT(A), we condone the said delay of 253 days in filing of appeal before the ld.CIT(A) and restore the issues raised on merits to the file of ld.CIT(A) for necessary adjudication and pass a speaking order as contemplated u/s.250(6) of the Act. Effective grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.

4.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced on this 21st day of March, 2025.

More judgments on Section 80P

All 5,069 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80P →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →