RELIANCE INDUTRIES EMP CO. OP. CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.,RAIGAD vs. ITO, WARD 4, PANVEL, PANVEL
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the 253-day delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A), considering the prior decision in the assessee's own case and the reasonable cause for the delay. The issues were restored to the CIT(A) for adjudication on merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal for AY 2018-19 was dismissed by the CIT(A) as barred by limitation due to a 253-day delay, excluding the COVID-19 period. The assessee sought condonation of delay, citing a previous order where the Tribunal condoned a similar delay.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) can be condoned, and whether the matter should be restored for adjudication on merits.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 250,Section 143(3),Section 143(3A),Section 143(3B),Section 80P,Section 250(6)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCHES “SMC”, PUNE
Before: DR.MANISH BORAD & SHRI S.S.VISWANETHRA RAVI
आदेश / ORDER
PER DR. MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :
The captioned appeal at the instance of assessee pertaining the assessment year 2018-19 is directed against the order dated 05.11.2024 framed by National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi passed u/s.250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ( in short ‘the Act’) which inturn is arising out of the Assessment order dated 13.04.2021 passed u/s.143(3) r.w.s.143(3A) & 143(3B) of the Act.
At the outset, Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that ld.CIT(A) has dismissed the appeal being barred by limitation as the appeal was filed belatedly by 253 days (excluding covid-19 pandemic outbreak period). He further referred to the decision of the Tribunal in assessee’s own case for the A.Y. 2020-21 where also the Tribunal vide order dated 08.01.2025 under similar facts and circumstances has condoned the delay in filing the appeal before the ld.CIT(A). Therefore, a prayer is made to restore the matter back to the file of ld.CIT(A) for necessary adjudication on merit. Ld. Departmental Representative did not oppose the request of restoring the issues on merit to the file of ld.CIT(A) for necessary adjudication.
We have heard both the sides and perused the record placed before us. We observe that the assessee is a Cooperative Society, passed through scrutiny proceedings for the A.Y. 2018- 19, wherein certain additions in the form of disallowance u/s.80P of the Act at Rs.38,63,270/-. Aggrieved assessee preferred an appeal before the ld.CIT(A) but the same was delayed by 253 delay excluding the covid-19 pandemic period and even though the reasons explaining the delay were furnished by the assessee, the ld.CIT(A) did not condone the delay and dismissed the appeal as barred by limitation. We however considering that under similar facts and circumstances this Tribunal has condoned the delay filed before the ld.CIT(A) in assessee’s own case for the A.Y. 2021-22 and considering the reasonable cause which prevented the assessee from filing the appeal within the stipulated time before the ld.CIT(A), we condone the said delay of 253 days in filing of appeal before the ld.CIT(A) and restore the issues raised on merits to the file of ld.CIT(A) for necessary adjudication and pass a speaking order as contemplated u/s.250(6) of the Act. Effective grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced on this 21st day of March, 2025.
More judgments on Section 80P
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Na vs Ari Khedut Sahkari Society Ltd…ITA 362/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026