Facts
The assessee's appeal for A.Y. 2011-12 was directed against an order that arose from an assessment order passed u/s.143(3) r.w.s.147 of the Act. The assessee failed to appear for multiple hearings before the CIT(A), leading to the dismissal of the appeal for non-prosecution.
Held
The Tribunal noted that the assessee failed to appear on several occasions, leading to an ex-parte order by the CIT(A). Considering the interest of justice, the Tribunal restored the issues to the file of the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.
Key Issues
Whether the appeal should be restored to the file of CIT(A) for fresh adjudication due to the assessee's non-appearance on multiple hearing dates.
Sections Cited
250, 143(3), 147
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCHES “SMC”, PUNE
Before: DR.MANISH BORAD & SHRI VINAY BHAMORE
आदेश / ORDER
PER DR. MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :
The captioned appeal at the instance of assessee pertaining to A.Y. 2011-12 is directed against the order dated 28.11.2024 passed by Addl./JCIT(A), Coimbatore u/s.250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) arising out of the Assessment order dated 14.12.2018 passed u/s.143(3) r.w.s.147 of the Act.
Even though valid notices were issued and served upon the assessee, none appeared on the date of hearing fixed on 27.02.2025 and thereafter Mr.Gyaneshwar Kataram appeared through virtual mode on the date of hearing fixed on 10.03.2025 wherein next date of hearing was informed to both the parties. However, today, assessee failed to appear in person or through his Authorised Representative. We therefore proceed to adjudicate the appeal with the assistance of ld. Departmental Representative.
We have heard the ld. Departmental Representative and perused the record placed before us. A perusal of the impugned order indicates that the same is exparte on account of non compliance by the assessee on various dates of hearing fixed by ld.CIT(A). Ld. CIT(A) has dismissed the appeal mainly for non-prosecution. Ld. Departmental Representative has no objection if the issues are restored to the file of ld.CIT(A) for fresh adjudication. We notice that the assessee is an individual. Assessment was completed u/s.143(3) r.w.s.147 of the Act for A.Y. 2011-12 wherein addition of Rs.3,04,800/- has been made to the returned income of Rs.1,18,926/-. Assessee challenged the addition before ld.CIT(A) but thereafter failed to appear on the dates of hearing fixed on five occasions which included the one fixed during the covid-19 pandemic period. We therefore considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in the larger interest of justice deem it proper to restore the issues to the file of ld.CIT(A) for necessary adjudication. Assessee is directed to provide latest email id and contact detail to the department for receiving the notices from ITBA portal. Assessee is also directed to remain vigilant and not to take unnecessary adjournment unless otherwise required for reasonable cause. Impugned order is set aside and the effective grounds of appeal raised by the assessee in Form No.36 are allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced on this 13th day of May, 2025.