AB SANDVIK COROMANT,PUNE vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), CIRCLE-1, PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the Departmental Representative had no objection to the assessee's request. Consequently, the Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal, and the grounds of appeal were dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the Income Tax Officer. During the hearing, the assessee submitted that they had received Form 2 under the VSVS Scheme-2024, requiring withdrawal of the current appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee can withdraw the appeal during the pendency of the proceedings under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2024.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 144C(13),Section 91(3)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCHES “C” :: PUNE
Before: DR.DIPAK P. RIPOTE & SHRI VINAY BHAMORE
Assessment Year: 2019-20 AB Sandvik Coromant, V The Assistant C/o.Sandvik Coromant India s Commissioner of Income Private Limited, Tax(international Mumbai Pune Road, Dapodi, Taxation), Circle-1, Pune – 411012. Maharashtra. Pune. PAN: AABCA5161C Appellant/ Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee by Shri Yash Inamdar – AR Revenue by Shri Prakash L Pathade – CIT(DR) Date of hearing 04/06/2025 Date of pronouncement 05/06/2025 आदेश/ ORDER PER DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, AM:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of (IT) Circle-1, u/s.143(3) r.w.s 144C(13) Pune, dated 13.12.2022 for the A.Y.2019-20.
At the outset of hearing, ld.AR for the assessee submitted that they are in receipt of Form 2 under VSVS Scheme-2024, therefore, assessee intends to withdraw this appeal. Ld.AR filed written request for withdrawal of the current appeal as under :
On the other hand, the ld.Departmental Representative(ld.DR) of the Revenue did not object to the contention of the assessee and has no objection if the appeal of assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the above, we permit to withdraw the appeal of the assessee. Accordingly, grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open Court on 05 June, 2025.
More judgments on Section 144C(13)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026