WIRTGEN INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,DAUND vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-12, PUNE, PUNE

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE

BEFORE SHRI MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
AND SHRI VINAY BHAMORE, JUDICIAL MEMBER

आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.571/PUN/2025
िनधाᭅरण वषᭅ / Assessment Year : 2021-22

Wirtgen
India
Private
Limited,
Gat
No.301/302,
Bhandgaon,
Khor
Road,
Vill- Bhandgaon,
Tal- Daund – 412214. PAN : AAACW2816R
Vs. DCIT, Circle-12, Pune.
Appellant

Respondent

आदेश / ORDER

PER VINAY BHAMORE, JM:

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 27.12.2024 passed by Ld. Addl./JCIT(A)-3, Hyderabad for the assessment year 2021-22. 2. When the matter was called for hearing, Ld. AR of the assessee filed an application seeking permission to withdraw the above captioned appeal on the ground that the addition made u/s 143(1) of the IT Act has been deleted by the Assessing Officer in Assessee by : Shri Kishor B. Phadke
Revenue by : Shri Amit Bobde

Date of hearing
: 30.07.2025
Date of pronouncement : 30.07.2025
2
accordance with the directions of the Ld. CIT(A). The copy of order giving effect passed by the Assessing Officer is also filed before the Bench.
3. Ld. DR raised no serious objection to permit the withdrawal of the appeal.
4. In the circumstances, we hereby grant permission to the appellant to withdraw the appeal. Accordingly, the above captioned appeal stands dismissed as ‘withdrawn’.
5. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands dismissed as ‘withdrawn’.
Order pronounced on this 30th day of July, 2025. (MANISH BORAD)
JUDICIAL MEMBER

पुणे / Pune; ᳰदनांक / Dated : 30th July, 2025. Sujeet
आदेश कᳱ ᮧितिलिप अᮕेिषत / Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1. अपीलाथᱮ / The Appellant.
2. ᮧ᭜यथᱮ / The Respondent.
3. The Addl./JCIT(A)-3, Hyderabad.
4. The Pr. CIT/CIT concerned.
5. िवभागीय ᮧितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, “B” बᱶच,
पुणे / DR, ITAT, “B” Bench, Pune.

////
Senior Private Secretary

आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, पुणे / ITAT, Pune.