AB SANDVIK COROMANT,PUNE vs. ACIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), CIRCLE-1, PUNE
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the Departmental Representative had no objection to the dismissal of the appeal as withdrawn. Consequently, the Tribunal permitted the withdrawal of the appeal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax. During the hearing, no one appeared for the assessee, but a letter was submitted requesting withdrawal of the appeal. The assessee had received Form-2 under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2024, and was required to withdraw the pending appeal as part of the scheme.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal can be permitted to be withdrawn as per the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2024.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 144C(13),Section 91(3)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCHES “C” :: PUNE
Before: DR.DIPAK P. RIPOTE & SHRI VINAY BHAMORE
Assessment Year: 2020-21 AB Sandvik Coromant, V The ACIT(International C/o. Sandvik Coromant India s Taxation), Private Limited Mumbai Pune Circle-1, Pune. Road, Dapodi S.O.Pune City, Pune – 411012. Maharashtra. PAN: AABCA5161C Appellant/ Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee by None Revenue by Shri Prakash L Pathade – CIT(DR) Date of hearing 07/08/2025 Date of pronouncement 08/08/2025 आदेश/ ORDER
PER DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, AM:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of ld.Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-Circle-1, Pune passed u/s.143(3) r.w.s 144C(13) of the Act, dated 07.06.2024 for the A.Y.2020-21.
At the outset of hearing, no one appeared on behalf of the Assessee. However, a letter has been submitted dated 09.07.2025.
The assessee submitted that he has received Form-2 under DTVSV Scheme, dated 26.06.2025, therefore, assessee intends to withdraw this appeal. Assessee filed request for withdrawal of the current appeal as under :
On the other hand, the ld.Departmental Representative(ld.DR) of the Revenue did not object to the contention of the assessee and has no objection if the appeal of assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the above, we permit to withdraw the appeal of the assessee. Accordingly, grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open Court on 08 August, 2025.
More judgments on Section 144C(13)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026