SYNECHRON TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TP)2(2), PUNE

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
PUNE BENCH “C”, PUNE

BEFORE SHRI MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
AND SHRI VINAY BHAMORE, JUDICIAL MEMBER

आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.215/PUN/2021
िनधाᭅरण वषᭅ / Assessment Year : 2016-17

Synechron
Technologies
Pvt. Ltd.,
CEDAR Building, Ascendas
International,
Tech
Park
Pune, Plot No.18, Rajiv
Gandhi
Infotech
Park,
Hinjewadi, Phase III,
Pune- 411057. PAN : AAICS2894R
Vs. DCIT, TP-2(2), Pune.
Appellant

Respondent

आदेश / ORDER

PER VINAY BHAMORE, JM:

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against final assessment order dated 31.03.2021 passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s.
144C(13) r.w.s. 143(3A) & 143(3B) of the IT Act for the assessment year 2016-17. 2. When the matter was called for hearing, none appeared on behalf of the assessee despite due service of notice of hearing,
Assessee by : None
Revenue by : Shri Prakash L. Pathade

Date of hearing
: 16.10.2025
Date of pronouncement : 16.10.2025
2
however, a detailed written submission dated 10.10.2025 was filed stating that the assessee wish to withdraw the above captioned appeal for which Ld. DR has no serious objection.
3. In the circumstances, we hereby grant permission to the appellant to withdraw the appeal. Accordingly, the above captioned appeal stands dismissed as ‘withdrawn’.
4. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands dismissed as ‘withdrawn’.
Order pronounced on this 16th day of October, 2025. (MANISH BORAD)
JUDICIAL MEMBER

पुणे / Pune; ᳰदनांक / Dated : 16th October, 2025. Sujeet
आदेश कᳱ ᮧितिलिप अᮕेिषत / Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1. अपीलाथᱮ / The Appellant.
2. ᮧ᭜यथᱮ / The Respondent.
3. The CIT(DRP-3), Mumbai-2. 4. The Pr.CIT/CIT concerned.
5. िवभागीय ᮧितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, “C” बᱶच,
पुणे / DR, ITAT, “C” Bench, Pune.

////
Senior Private Secretary

आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, पुणे / ITAT, Pune.