BHIKSHU MARGAM,PUNE vs. CIT CIRCLE 2 , PUNE, PUNE
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee had furnished various details in response to notices, and the Revenue's contention that no details were filed was incorrect. The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) erred in upholding the ad-hoc disallowance without establishing specific deficiencies. Therefore, the order of the CIT(A) was set aside, and the AO was directed to delete the disallowance.
What were the facts?
The assessee, engaged in manufacturing and trading of marble and stones, filed its return declaring a certain income. The return was selected for scrutiny, and during the assessment, the Assessing Officer asked for party-wise details of purchases and expenses. The assessee failed to provide complete details, leading the AO to disallow Rs. 50 lakhs as an ad-hoc disallowance.
What were the issues?
Whether the ad-hoc disallowance of Rs. 50 lakhs made by the AO and upheld by the CIT(A) was justified when the assessee claimed to have provided sufficient details and evidence for purchases and expenses.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(2),Section 142(1),Section 133(6),Section 131,Section 40A(2)(b),Section 37(1),Section 270A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “A”, PUNE
Before: SHRI R. K. PANDA & Ms. ASTHA CHANDRA
आदेश की प्रतितिति अग्रेतिि/Copy of the Order is forwarded to:
1. 1. अपील र्थी / The Appellant; प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent 2.
More judgments on Section 142(1)
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Subhash Chand Saini, Jaipur vs ITO Ward, Behror, BherorITA 36/JPR/2023[2017-18]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gaurav Jiteshbhai Joshi, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1000/RJT/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sukant Kumar vs. Union Of INDIA And 6 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S New Sana Brick Field vs. Union Of INDIA And 4 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Vinay Singh vs. Union Of INDIAAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Aaradhyam Infrabuilders PVT LTD vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026