KINETA GLOBAL LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD

PDF · subscribers
ITA 912/HYD/2025Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad24 July 2025AY 2018-2019Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao (Vice President), Shri Madhusudan Sawdia, Accountant Member आ.अपी.सं / ITA No.912/Hyd/2025 (निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Year: 2018-19) | M/s. Kineta Global Ltd Hyderabad PAN:AACCK7944A (Appellant) | Vs. | Dy.CIT Circle 2(1) Hyderabad (Respondent) | |---|---|---| | निर्धारिती द्वारा / Assessee by: | Shri S Venkateswarulu, CA | | | राजस्व द्वारा / Revenue by:: | Shri Narender Kumar Naik, CIT (DR) | | | सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of hearing: | 24/07/2025 | | | घोषणा की तारीख / Pron4 pages
AI SummaryDismissed as withdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that the appeal was indeed a duplicate. Considering the assessee's request for withdrawal and the Departmental Representative's no-objection, the Tribunal allowed the appeal to be withdrawn and consequently dismissed it as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

M/s. Kineta Global Ltd filed a duplicate appeal (ITA No.912/Hyd/2025) for Assessment Year 2018-19 against an order of the CIT(A), having already filed another appeal (ITA No.800/Hyd/2025) for the same assessment year. The assessee's counsel informed the Tribunal about the duplicate filing and sought to withdraw the present appeal.

What were the issues?

Whether a duplicate appeal filed by the assessee for the same assessment year and impugned order should be allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘ SM/DB- ‘ Bench, Hyderabad

Before: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

Hearing: 24/07/2025

Per Vijay Pal Rao, Vice President

1.

This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 3/3/2025 of the learned CIT (A)-NFAC Delhi, relating to A.Y.2018-19.

2.

At the time of hearing, the learned Counsel for the assessee has stated that this is a duplicate appeal filed against the impugned order of the learned CIT (A) as the assessee has Page 1 of 4 already filed an appeal in which is also listed for hearing today itself. He has filed a letter of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeal as under:

3.

Thus, the learned AR has submitted that the assessee may be allowed to withdraw the present appeal.

4.

On the other land, the learned DR has raised no objection if this being a duplicate appeal to be dismissed as withdrawn.

5.

Having considered the submission of the parties as well as the request of the assessee, we find that this appeal is a duplicate appeal filed by the assessee as the assessee has already filed an appeal against the impugned order in ITA No.800/Hyd/2025. Accordingly, this appeal of the assessee is allowed to be withdrawn and consequently dismissed being withdrawn.

6.

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed being withdrawn.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →