PEDA SUBBA RAO UNNAM,ADDANKI vs. ITO, WARD-1, ONGOLE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal, noting the assessee's request for withdrawal due to duplicate filing and the lack of objection from the Departmental Representative, granted permission for the withdrawal of the appeal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed under Section 147 r.w.s 144B. Subsequently, the Authorized Representative informed the Tribunal that the appeal was a duplicate filing, as another appeal concerning the same matter was already active, and requested to withdraw the present appeal.
What were the issues?
Withdrawal of a duplicate appeal filed by the assessee before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘A’ Bench, Hyderabad
करदाताका""त"न"ध"व/ : No Representation Assessee Represented by राज"वका""त"न"ध"व/ : Shri S. Arun Kumar, Sr. AR Department Represented by सुनवाईसमा"तहोनेक""त"थ/ : 08/12/2025 Date of Conclusion of Hearing घोषणा क" तार"ख/ : 08/12/2025 Date of Pronouncement ORDER
PER RAVISH SOOD, JM:
The present appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, (NFAC), Delhi, dated 13/08/2025, which in turn arises from the order passed by the Assessing Officer (for short, “A.O.”) under Section 147 r.w.s 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, “the Act”) dated 28/11/2023. 2 Peda Subba Rao Unnam vs. ITO 2. Before us, there was no representation on behalf of the assessee to present the case. However, at the threshold of the hearing of the appeal, we observed from the record that Shri G. Srinivasa Rao, Chartered Accountant, the Authorized Representative for the assessee appellant had filed a letter, dated 05/12/2025 (copy placed on record) wherein it was submitted that “An appeal against the very same appellate order passed by the CIT(A), NAFC is pending before Hon’ble ITAT, SMC Bench, Hyderabad vide which is active. Therefore, the appellant is not willing to pursue the duplicate appeal vide Hon’ble Bench to withdraw the same”. The Ld.AR’s letter, dated 05/12/2025 (supra) seeking withdrawal of the aforesaid appeal, is reproduced, as under :
Per contra, the Ld. DR did not raise any objection to the seeking of withdrawal of the appeal by the assessee appellant.
3 Peda Subba Rao Unnam vs. ITO 3. Considering the aforesaid facts, we herein grant liberty to the assessee appellant to withdraw the captioned appeal.
Resultantly, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on 08th December, 2025. S S /- d/- (मधुसूदन साव"डया) (रवीश सूद) (MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA) (RAVISH SOOD) लेखासद"य/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER "या"यकसद"य/JUDICIAL MEMBER d/- Hyderabad, dated 08.12.2025. OKK/sps आदेशक"""त"ल"पअ"े"षत/ Copy of the order forwarded to:- 1. "नधा"रती/The : Peda Subba Rao Unnam, H.No.2-55, Umamaheswarapuram, Mundlamuru, Assessee Ongole, Andhra Pradesh-523265. 2. राज"व/ : Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Ongole. The Revenue 3. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, 4. "वभागीय""त"न"ध, आयकरअपील"यअ"धकरण /DR,ITAT, Hyderabad.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026