Facts
The assessee, a company registered under the Companies Act, 2013 and involved in charitable activities, applied for registration under Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Income Tax Act. The Ld. CIT(E) rejected this application in limine due to the assessee's non-compliance with the notice and failure to file necessary documents.
Held
The ITAT acknowledged the assessee's submission of additional evidence and its prayer for an opportunity to present its case on merits. The tribunal restored the appeal to the Ld. CIT(E), directing a fresh order on merit after providing the assessee a full opportunity to plead its case and consider the documents filed.
Key Issues
Whether an application for registration under Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii) can be rejected in limine without providing adequate opportunity to the assessee to submit documents and present its case.
Sections Cited
12A(1)(ac)(iii)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH: KOLKATA
Before: Shri Rajesh Kumar&Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey]
ORDER / आदेश Per Pradip Kumar Choubey, JM:
These are the appeals preferred by the assessee against the separate orders of Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)- Kolkata (hereinafter referred to as the Ld. CIT(A)] dated 30.11.2024 for AY 2024-25. In both the appeals issues are common hence taken up together for disposal. We shall take in for AY 2012-13 as a lead case.
& 162/Kol/2025 Assessment Year: 2024-25 Sevayan Social Welfare Foundation 2. Brief facts of the case of the assessee are that the assessee is a company registered under the Companies Act, 2013 are dedicated to providing free medical services and supporting socio-economic development for underprivileged communities. The assessee filed an application under Form no. 10AB for registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Act. Notice was issued but there was no compliance on behalf of the assessee to the notice, as a result of which, the application of granting registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) is rejected by Ld. CIT(E) in limine.
Aggrieved by the said order, the present appeal has been filed by the assessee. The assessee filed additional evidence under Rule 29 of the ITAT Rules and submitted that Ld. CIT( E) has rejected the grant of registration in limine when the assessee did not file any documents, hence his prayer is to send back the case of the assessee to the file of Ld. CIT(E ) to decide his case on merit after providing the assessee an opportunity to place documents.
The Ld. D.R did not raise any objection.
Upon hearing the submission of the counsel of the respective parties, we have gone through the order passed by the Ld. CIT(E) and find that the application for registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) has been rejected when there were no responses from the side of the assessee. Before us the assessee has filed several documents in regard to the activities of the assessee, granting of provisional registration and other documents relates to the granting of registration. The prayer of the assessee is that the assessee has been given one more opportunity to plead its case before the Ld. CIT(E ) on merits.
Keeping in view, the order passed by the Ld. CIT(E ) and the documents filed by the assessee before us, for the interest of justice we are inclined to restore the appeal of the assessee before the Ld. CIT(E ) with a direction to pass afresh order on merit after giving opportunity to the assessee to plead its case on merit. The Ld. CIT(E) is directed to consider the documents filed by the assessee in granting registration.
Order is pronounced in the open court on 16th April, 2025
Sd/- Sd/- (Rajesh Kumar/राजेश कुमार) (Pradip Kumar Choubey /�द�प कुमार चौबे) Accountant Member/लेखा सद�य Judicial Member/�या�यक सद�य Dated: 16th April, 2025 SM, Sr. PS Copy of the order forwarded to: 1. Appellant- Sevayan Social Welfare Foundation, 39, Ghosh Bagan Badra, North 24 Paraganas, LP 161/2/1, Italgacha, North 24 Parganas-700079 2. Respondent – CIT(E ), Kolkata 3. Ld. PCIT- , Kolkata 4. DR, Kolkata Benches, Kolkata (sent through e-mail)