JAIAMBAY COMMERCIAL PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 60(2), KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the Ld. CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal based on delay without properly considering the assessee's claim that the appeal was filed within the statutory period from the date of receipt of the order. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and remanded the matter back for a fresh decision on merits, instructing the CIT(A) to provide the assessee a reasonable opportunity to furnish evidence regarding timely filing.
What were the facts?
The assessee's assessment was framed u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, making additions/disallowances. The assessee appealed to the Ld. CIT(A), but the appeal was dismissed as time-barred due to an alleged 44-day delay, calculated from the date of the order. The assessee contended that the appeal was filed within time, as the limitation period should be counted from the date of receipt of the assessment order (02.06.2015) rather than the date of passing (25.03.2015), and also noted confusion with a subsequent reassessment order u/s 147 r.w. Section 143(3) dated 28.12.2019.
What were the issues?
Whether the Ld. CIT(A) was justified in dismissing the assessee's appeal as time-barred, and whether the appeal was filed within the prescribed time limit when considering the date of receipt of the assessment order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘A’ BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: SHRI PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY & SHRI RAKESH MISHRA
order
: 09-June-2025 ORDER
PER RAKESH MISHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This appeal filed by the assessee is against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-NFAC, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as Ld. 'CIT(A)'] passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) for AY 2012-13 dated 21.10.2024, which has been passed against the assessment order u/s 143(3) of the Act dated 28.12.2019.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026