← Back to search

ROHIT PREM CHHABRA,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT , INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT

PDF
ITA 5858/MUM/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai06 January 20253 pages

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘D’ BENCH
MUMBAI

BEFORE: SHRI BR BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
&

SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER
Rohit Prem Chhabra
A-415 Vashi Plaza,
Sector-17, Vashi,
Navi Mumbai-
400703. Vs. Assessment Unit,
Income Tax Department.

PAN/GIR No. ADLPC7338R
(Appellant)
..
(Respondent)

Assessee by Ms. Aishwarya
Revenue by Shri. R.R Makwana, Addl.
CIT
Date of Hearing
02/01/2025
Date of Pronouncement
06/01/2025
आदेश / O R D E R

PER SUNIL KUMAR SINGH (J.M): 1. This appeal has been preferred against the impugned order dated 20.09.2024 passed in Appeal no. NFAC/2017- 18/10297102 by the Ld. Commissioner of Income– tax(Appeals)/ National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) [hereinafter referred to as the “CIT(A)”] u/s. 250 of the Income- Tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as "Act"] for the Assessment year [A.Y.] 2018-19. 2. Briefly stating, learned assessing officer passed assessment order u/s. 144 r/w 147 of the Act and made addition of Rs. Rohit Prem Chhabra

2
1,78,40,490/- in the total income of the assessee on account of sale consideration and interest income. Aggrieved assessee passed an appeal before learned CIT(A), who dismissed assessee’s appeal ex-parte.
3. Aggrieved by the impugned order passed by learned CIT(A), assessee has preferred this second appeal on the ground that learned CIT(A) has erred in confirming the aforesaid additions.
4. At the very outset it is informed by the learned representative for the assessee that the appeal in the physical form has already been filed on the similar facts and grounds against the impugned order, vide ITA NO. 5847/MUM/2024, which has been heard today, hence present appeal has become infructuous.
5. In view of the above, it appears that this appeal is the duplication of physically filed appeal
ITA no.
5847/MUM/2024, which is also listed for hearing today.
Hence, this duplicate ITA no. 5858/MUM/2024 stands dismissed as infructuous.
Order pronounced in open court on 06.01.2025. (BR BASKARAN) (SUNIL KUMAR SINGH)
ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
JUDICIAL MEMBER
Mumbai; Dated 06/01/2025
Anandi Nambi, Steno
Copy of the Order forwarded to:

1.

The Appellant 2. The Respondent. 3. CIT 4. DR, ITAT, Mumbai 5. Guard file. Rohit Prem Chhabra

BY ORDER,

(Asstt.

ROHIT PREM CHHABRA,NAVI MUMBAI vs ASSESSMENT UNIT , INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT | BharatTax