MOHAMMED SAJID KHAN,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 40(1), KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the minor delay in filing the appeal, accepting the assessee's illness as a reasonable cause. It set aside the ex-parte order of the CIT(A) and remitted the case back for fresh adjudication. The CIT(A) was directed to provide the assessee with an opportunity of being heard and to consider any further evidence under Rule 46A of the Income Tax Rules, 1962.
What were the facts?
The assessee deposited ₹1.84 crore in a bank account during FY 2014-15 but did not file an income return. The Assessing Officer initiated reassessment under Section 147, adding the cash as unexplained income, which led to an assessment of ₹1.87 crore. The CIT(A) subsequently dismissed the assessee's appeal for non-prosecution, which the assessee attributed to serious illness.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned due to the assessee's illness, and whether the CIT(A)'s ex-parte dismissal for non-prosecution should be set aside to allow the assessee a fresh opportunity to present its case regarding the unexplained cash deposits.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 144B,Section 250,Section 142(1),Section 148,Section 143(1)(a)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘B’ BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI RAKESH MISHRA
order
: 18-July-2025 ORDER
PER RAKESH MISHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This appeal filed by the assessee is against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-NFAC, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as Ld. 'CIT(A)'] passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) for AY 2015-16 dated 28.08.2024, which has been passed against the assessment order u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B of the Act, dated 03.05.2023.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Om.S.R. Construction, Through Its Proprietor Mr. Kuldeep Sharma vs. The State Of Jharkhand Through Its Commissioner, Commerical Tax DepartmentJharkhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026