BHARAT HARI GUPTA,KOLKATA, WEST BENGAL vs. DCIT, KOLKATA, WEST BENGAL
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The learned DR did not object to the withdrawal request. Considering the resolution of the underlying issue through rectification and the assessee's application, the tribunal permitted the withdrawal of the appeal.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was filed against a CIT(A) order under Section 250. During the hearing, the assessee's representative informed the tribunal that a rectification application under Section 154 had been processed, resulting in the acceptance of the returned income and a refund being credited. Consequently, the assessee filed an application to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether to permit the withdrawal of an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal when the core dispute has been resolved through a rectification order and a refund issued by the Assessing Officer.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘A’ BENCH
Before: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra
Assessment Year: 2009-10 Bharat Hari Gupta..……………………..…………………....Appellant 7AB, Bright Apartments, 7, Brigde Street, Kolkata – 700019. [PAN: AELPG3307H] vs. DCIT, Circle-1(1), Kolkata…..……………..………………….…..... Respondent Appearances by: Smt. Lalitha Del, AR appeared on behalf of the appellant. Shri Bonnie Debbarma, Sr. DR, appeared on behalf of the Respondent. Date of concluding the hearing : July 22, 2025 Date of pronouncing the order : July 23, 2025 आदेश / ORDER
Per Sonjoy Sarma, Judicial Member:
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 27.11.2024 passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-2, Gurugram [in short CIT(A)] under section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
At the time of hearing, the learned AR submitted that the assessee had filed a rectification application under Section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, before the Assessing Officer. The said application was disposed of by passing an order under Section 154 read with Section 143(1) of the Act dated 16.04.2025. As a result of the rectification, the returned income was accepted and the refund has also been credited to the assessee's bank account. In view of the above, the assessee has filed an application dated 19.07.2025 before the Bench seeking withdrawal of the appeal.
Bharat Hari Gupta 3. The learned DR did not raise any objection to the prayer of the assessee. 4. Considering the above facts and circumstances and in view of the application filed by the assessee, we permit the withdrawal of the appeal. 5. In the result the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Kolkata, the 23rd July, 2025.
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026