JALAN NIKETAN PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(2),, KOLKATA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal found that the affidavit submitted by the assessee did not provide any valid reasons for the substantial delay in filing the appeal. Consequently, the Tribunal refused to condone the delay and dismissed the assessee's appeal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the Pr.CIT(A) under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2016-2017. The appeal was filed with a delay of 1355 days, for which the assessee submitted an affidavit seeking condonation of the delay.
What were the issues?
Whether the substantial delay of 1355 days in filing the appeal against the order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 should be condoned based on the reasons provided in the affidavit.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI
आदेश / O R D E R Per George Mathan, JM :
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. Pr.CIT(A), Kolkata-2, dated 24.03.2021 passed u/s.263 of the Act for the assessment year 2016-2017. 2. Shri B.C.Jain, ld.AR represented on behalf of the assessee. Shri P.N.Barnwal, CIT-DR appeared on behalf of the revenue. 3. The appeal filed by the assessee is delayed by 1355 days. In this regard, the assessee has filed affidavit as follows :-
4. The affidavit does not give any valid reasons for the delay. As no valid reason has been provided, the delay in filing the present appeal is not condoned and consequently the appeal of the assessee is dismissed on account of delay. 5. In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed. Order dictated and pronounced in the open court on 18/11/2025.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026