DAMODARAN PADMA,,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CORPORATE WARD-6(3), CHENNAI

आयकर अपीलȣय अͬधकरण, ‘बी’ Ûयायपीठ, चेÛन
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Įी जॉज[ जॉज[ के, उपाÚय¢ एवं Įी एस.आर.रघुनाथा, लेखा सदèय के सम¢
BEFORE SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, VICE PRESIDENTAND
SHRI S.R. RAGHUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.: 3162/CHNY/2024
िनधाᭅरण वषᭅ/Assessment Year: 2016-17

Smt.Damodaran Padma,
26/27, Erabalu Chetty Street,
Mannadi,Chennai-600 001. PAN: AFXPP-8280-M

Vs.
Income Tax Officer,
Corporate Ward-6(3)
Chennai.
(अपीलाथᱮ/Appellant)

(ᮧ᭜यथᱮ/Respondent)

अपीलाथᱮ कᳱ ओर से/Appellant by : Mr. P.M. Kathir, Advocate
ᮧ᭜यथᱮ कᳱ ओर से/Respondent by : Ms.Gauthami Manivasagam, JCIT

सुनवाई कᳱ तारीख/Date of Hearing : 18.02.2025
घोषणा कᳱ तारीख/Date of Pronouncement : .02.2025

आदेश /O R D E R

PER GEORGE GEORGE K, VICE PRESIDENT:

This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against
CIT(A) - NFAC order dated 11.11.2024, passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called ‘the Act’). The relevant
Assessment Year is 2016-17. 2. At the outset, it is noticed that the ld.AR for the assessee filed letter dated 17.02.2025 stating that assessee has filed Form No.1
before the PCIT under the DTVSV Scheme, 2024 for withdrawal of appeal stating that the assessee has opted for Direct Tax Vivad Se
Vishwas Scheme, 2024. In light of the above, we dismiss the appeal of the assessee as withdrawn. However, liberty is given to the assessee to seek revival of appeal, in case assessee remains unsuccessful in settlement of appeal under the scheme.
3. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on 18th February, 2025. (एस.आर. रघुनाथा)
(S.R. RAGHUNATHA)
लेखा सदèय/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
(जॉज[ जॉज[ के)
(GEORGE GEORGE K)
उपाÚय¢ /VICE PRESIDENT

चेÛनई/Chennai,
Ǒदनांक/Dated, the 18th February, 2025

DS

आदेश कȧ ĤǓतͧलͪप अĒेͪषत/Copy to: