KADERSA MOHAMED DHAWUDU MOHAMED SHAFIQ,SALEM vs. ITO, WARD-1(1), SALEM
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, noting that the delay was not willful or wanton and that the Revenue did not raise serious objections. The Tribunal set aside the order of the First Appellate Authority and directed it to re-adjudicate the matter de novo, after giving the assessee an opportunity of being heard. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, subject to the assessee paying Rs. 5000/- to the Tamil Nadu Legal Services Authority.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the tribunal with a delay of 447 days. The assessee cited technical difficulties and lack of awareness of electronic working as reasons for the delay. The First Appellate Authority had passed an ex-parte order confirming the assessment order due to non-compliance with statutory notices.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal can be condoned? Whether the matter should be remanded back to the First Appellate Authority for fresh adjudication?
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI ABY T VARKEY & SHRI AMITABH SHUKLA
Years: 2011-12 Kadersa Mohamed Dhawudu Mohamed The Income Tax, Shafiq, Ward-1(1), No.22, Thiagambrahmam Street, Salem. Subramania Nagar, Salem, Tamil Nadu-636 005. [PAN: AGAPM4288Q] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Assessee by : Mr. A.Nikitha, Advocate, प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Revenue by : Mr.R.Raghupathy, Addl. CIT सुिवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 18.02.2025 घोर्णा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 21.02.2025 आदेश / O R D E R PER AMITABH SHUKLA, A.M :
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order bearing DIN & Order No.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023-24/1054358595(1) dated 14.07.2023 of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax [herein after “CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Center[NFAC], Delhi, for the assessment years 2011-12. Through the aforesaid appeal the assessee has challenged order u/s 250 dated 14.07.2023 passed by NFAC, Delhi.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026