SLOK ENTERPRISES,CHENNAI vs. ITO, NCW-1(6), CHENNAI

The registry has noted delay of 38 days in filing the respective appeal. Considering the reasons stated in the affidavit by the Assessee, we condone the delay and treat the reasons as ‘sufficient cause’ and admit the appeal for adjudication.

Brief facts are as under: The assessee is a firm derived income from business or profession filed its return of income on 31.03.2019 declaring loss of Rs.2,56,724/-. The case was selected for limited scrutiny. The AO noticed that the assessee has shown less purchases than the invoice value of imports shown in export & import data. Therefore, AO issued notices to the notice u/s. 143(2) and 142(1) of the Act. However, the assessee has failed to respond to the notices. Therefore, AO passed assessment order making an addition of Rs.19,97,061/- on account of unexplained expenditure u/s 69C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Assessee further challenged the order of assessment u/s 143(3) of the Act before the ld.CIT(A) who proceeded ex-parte and confirmed the order of the AO on merits.

Aggrieved by the CIT(A) order, assessee is in appeal before us.

Before us, the ld. Counsel for assessee submitted that the CIT(A) has sent the notices which were inadvertently not received by the assessee, hence the assessee was prevented from appearance on the purported dates. Therefore, he prayed that the assessee may be provided an adequate and proper representation time to file evidence and documents, if any, to substantiate his explanation regarding addition. The ld.DR stated that the assessee has defaulted in appearing before the appellate authority hence, no lenient view is to be taken in this case and prayed for dismissal of appeal.