SHRI RAMESHCHANDRA VADILAL SHAH,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-6(1), AHMEDABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal in limine due to the assessee's persistent non-appearance and lack of inclination to pursue the case. The assessee was granted liberty to seek recall of the order if prevented by sufficient cause.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was listed for hearing, but neither the assessee nor their authorized representative appeared. An adjournment application was also rejected. This was not the first instance of non-appearance.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's failure to appear before the Tribunal for the hearing of their appeal.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Multiplan India Ltd.2,267 citing38 ITD 320 · 1991 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “B” BENCH
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH
PER MAHAVIR PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER
This appeal by the Assessee is directed against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)-6, Ahmedabad dated 23.08.2016 pertaining to A.Y. 2012-13.
ITA No. 3150/Ahd/2016 2 . A.Y. 2012-13 2. On the date of hearing i.e. on 10-10-2018, an adjournment application was moved by the A.R. but none was present on earlier occasion also none appeared on behalf of the assessee before us. It appears that assessee is not inclined to pursue his appeal. Therefore, adjournment application is rejected. Thus following the decision of ITAT Delhi Bench in the case of CIT Vs Multiplan India (Pvt.) Ltd., 38 ITD 320 (Del), we dismiss the appeal of the assessee in limine. The assessee shall however be at liberty to approach the Tribunal for recalling of this order, if prevented by sufficient cause for non- appearance on the date of hearing.
In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced in Open Court on 11 - 10- 2018
Sd/- Sd/- (AMARJIT SINGH) (MAHAVIR PRASAD) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER True Copy JUDICIAL MEMBER Ahmedabad: Dated 11 /10/2018 Rajesh Copy of the Order forwarded to:- 1. The Appellant. 2. The Respondent. 3. The CIT (Appeals) – 4. The CIT concerned. 5. The DR., ITAT, Ahmedabad. 6. Guard File. By ORDER
Deputy/Asstt.Registrar ITAT,Ahmedabad
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Sukant Kumar vs. Union Of INDIA And 6 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S New Sana Brick Field vs. Union Of INDIA And 4 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026