ABDULRASHEED ARACHAMVEETTIL,THRISSUR vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1(1)& TPS THRISSUR, TRICHY

आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ‘ए’
यायपीठ, चे ई।
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
‘A’ BENCH: CHENNAI

ी एबी टी. वक
, ाियक सद एवं
एवं
एवं
एवं

ी एस. आर. रघुनाथा, लेखा सद के सम

BEFORE SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI S.R.RAGHUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.1409/Chny/2025
िनधारण वष/Assessment Year: 2018-19

Abdul Rasheed Arachamveettil,
Rajah Manor,
Kunnomkulam Chavakkad,
Chavakkad,
Thrissur-680 506. v.
The DCIT,
Circle-1(1) & TPS,
Thrissur.
[PAN: ABNPA 4382 K]

(अपीलाथ/Appellant)

(यथ/Respondent)

अपीलाथ क ओर से/ Appellant by :
Mr.Abhishek Murali, CA
यथ क ओर से /Respondent by :
Mr.Gautam S. Mukundan,
JCIT
सुनवाईकतारीख/Date of Hearing
:
10.10.2025
घोषणाकतारीख /Date of Pronouncement
:
23.10.2025

आदेश / O R D E R
PER ABY T. VARKEY, JM:

This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/NFAC, (hereinafter referred to as “the Ld.CIT(A)”), Delhi, dated 05.05.2025 for the Assessment Year (hereinafter referred to as "AY”) 2018-19. 2. At the outset, the Ld.Counsel for the assessee brought to our notice that this is a duplicate copy of the very same appeal filed before the ITAT,
Abdul Rasheed Arachamveettil
:: 2 ::

Cochin Bench [in ITA No.374/Coch/2025] and the same has been heard by the ITAT, Cochin Bench on 10.06.2025. Therefore, having taken judicial notice of the above facts, we find that the captioned duplicate appeal had to be held to be infructuous/non-maintainable in the light of the other appeal.
3. In the result, the ibid appeal filed by the assessee is held to be infructuous and allowed to be withdrawn.

Order pronounced on the 23rd day of October, 2025, in Chennai. (एस. आर. रघुनाथा)
(S.R.RAGHUNATHA)
लेखा सदय/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (एबी टी. वक
)
(ABY T. VARKEY)
याियक सदय/JUDICIAL MEMBER
चे ई/Chennai,
!दनांक/Dated: 23rd October, 2025. TLN
आदेश क ितिलिप अ$ेिषत/Copy to: