NISARGA CHARITABLE TRUST,BANGALORE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTIONS , BANGALORE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 450/BANG/2025Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore09 May 2025AY 2022-2023Bench: SHRI WASEEM AHMED (Accountant Member), SHRI KESHAV DUBEY (Judicial Member)1 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) found that procedural irregularities should not defeat the substantive claim where charitable activities are being carried out. It set aside both rejection orders and remanded the matters to the CIT(E) for fresh adjudication, with a directive to provide the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard.

What were the facts?

Nisarga Charitable Trust's applications for registration under Section 12AB and approval under Section 80G were rejected by the CIT(E) due to non-submission of documents and an untimely application for Section 12AB. The assessee contended that these were unintentional omissions and its activities aligned with charitable objects.

What were the issues?

Whether the rejection of applications for registration under Section 12AB and approval under Section 80G could be upheld solely based on procedural lapses and non-submission of documents, despite the trust's charitable activities having commenced.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12AB,Section 80G

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH, BANGALORE

Before: SHRI WASEEM AHMED & SHRI KESHAV DUBEY

For Appellant: Shri Nagaraj, Trust President
For Respondent: Shri E Shridhar, CIT (DR)
Hearing: 06.05.2025Pronounced: 09.05.2025

PER WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:

1.

These appeals by the assessee are directed against the separate orders passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Bangalore, both dated 12.08.2023, whereby the applications filed by the assessee under section 12AB and section 80G of the Income-tax Act, 1961, were rejected. the assessee's application in Form No. 10AB for registration under section 12AB was rejected on the grounds that: o the assessee failed to furnish all the documents/details as required despite opportunities being granted; o the application was filed on 19.02.2023, prior to the grant of provisional registration on 30.04.2023. the application seeking approval under section 80G was similarly rejected citing lack of compliance and failure to submit relevant documentation.

4.

During the course of hearing, the Ld. Authorised Representative (AR) submitted that the activities of the trust have been commenced in accordance with its stated charitable objects and the omissions in submission of documents were unintentional. He prayed that both matters may be set aside to the file of the Ld. CIT(E) for fresh adjudication. The ld. AR also assured full cooperation and submission of requisite information to the ld. CIT(E).

5.

On the other hand, the Ld. Departmental Representative (DR) did not raise any objection to the assessee’s prayer for remand.

6.

We have heard the rival contentions of both the parties and perused the materials on record. We find merit in the submissions of the Ld. AR. Mere procedural irregularities such as filing the application before obtaining provisional registration under section 12AB of the Act, or delay in filing supporting documents, should not defeat the substantive claim where the charitable activities have been initiated in line with the stated objects. Hence, in the interest of justice, both issues . are restored to the file of the Ld. CIT(E) for fresh adjudication. Accordingly, the order rejecting registration under section 12AB (ITA No. 450/BANG/2025), and the order rejecting approval under section 80G (ITA No. 451/BANG/2025) are set aside to the file of the Ld. CIT(E) with a direction to examine the assessee’s applications afresh, after affording a reasonable opportunity of being heard.

7.

The assessee is directed to submit all relevant documents and cooperate in the proceedings. No unwarranted adjournments shall be entertained, and failure to comply may lead to ex parte adjudication.

8.

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are hereby are allowed for statistical purposes.

More judgments on Section 12AB

All 5,972 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12AB →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →