KALPANA JANA,NEW DELHI vs. ITO), WARD-51(4), NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. This was based on the settlement of the matter under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order of the CIT(A). The assessee's counsel appeared, but the revenue did not. The assessee sought to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the appeal could be withdrawn due to settlement under a specific scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES “SMC-1” : DELHI
Before: SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI & SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI
PER BHAVNESH SAINI, J.M. This appeal by Assessee has been directed against the Order of the Ld. CIT(A)-35, New Delhi, Dated 30.05.2019, for the A.Y. 2014-2015.
2 ITA.No.7142/Del./2019 Smt. Kalpana Jana, New Delhi. 2. We have heard the Learned Counsel for the Assessee through video conferencing. 3. None appeared on behalf of the Revenue. 4. Learned Counsel for the Assessee seeks permission to withdraw the appeal as the matter is settled under VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, 2020 and requisite Form have been issued in favour of the assessee.
In view of the above, appeal of assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, appeal of Assessee dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open Court.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026