ANKIT JAIN,NEW DELHI vs. ADDL. CIT, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee requested withdrawal of their appeal before the ITAT. This was due to opting for settlement of tax arrears under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal can be withdrawn by the assessee upon opting for settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘C’ : NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU & SHRI K. NARASIMHA CHARY
BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI K. NARASIMHA CHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2009-10 ANKIT JAIN, Vs. ADDL. CIT, RANGE-22, PROP. M/S ANKIT INDIA, NEW DELHI 58, FRIENDS COLONY (EAST), NEW DELHI – 65 (PAN: AAFPJ5472J) (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Sh. Nem Singh, Adv. Respondent by : Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr. DR. Date of hearing : 10.02.2021 Date of pronouncement : 10.02.2021 ORDER PER G.S. PANNU, VP : This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2009-10 is directed against the order of Learned CIT(A)-10, New Delhi.
The assessee’s AR vide his email dated 1.2.2021 has requested for withdrawal of the appeal filed by the assessee and stated that the assessee
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Shadab Malik vs. State Of U.P. And 2 OthersAllahabad · 26 Oct 2026
- Salman vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 26 Oct 2026