VATSALA ASTHANA,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD-49(4), NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed in light of the settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal for AY 2012-2013. The assessee subsequently requested to withdraw the appeal as they opted to settle the tax dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal can be withdrawn and dismissed if the assessee opts for settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES “C” : DELHI
Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES “C” : DELHI [THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING] BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI MS. MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA.No.8564/Del./2019 Assessment Year 2012-2013 Smt. Vatsala Asthana, The Income Tax E-97, Hari Nagar, Maya Enclave, New Delhi. Officer, Ward – 49 (4), vs., PIN - 110 064. PAN AEFPA4935D New Delhi. (Appellant) (Respondent) For Assessee : -None- For Revenue : Ms. Anima Baranwal, Sr. D.R. Date of Hearing : 29.06.2021 Date of Pronouncement : 29.06.2021 ORDER PER G.S PANNU, V.P.
This appeal by the Assessee for the A.Y. 2012- 2013 is directed against the Order of the Ld. CIT(A)-17, New Delhi, Dated 24.09.2019.
2 ITA.No.8564/Del./2019
None appeared on behalf of the assessee at the time of Virtual Hearing before us. The assessee, vide letter dated NIL [received by the Registry on 18.06.2021], has requested for withdrawal of the appeal filed by her and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. A Certificate to this effect under section 5(1) of The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 has also been filed.
Learned Senior D.R. has no objection. 4. In view of the above, we accept the request of the assessee. 5. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. Above decision was pronounced on conclusion of Virtual Hearing on 29.06.2021.
More judgments on Section 5(1)
- Bajrang Singh Rajawat, Jaipur vs ITO Ward-7(2), JaipurITA 1120/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1232/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2016-17
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1231/SRT/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2015-16
- Amit Satpathy, Mumbai vs ITO-42(2)(1), MumbaiITA 5930/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed27 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
- Amish Anantrai Modi, Mumbai vs Central Circel 2(1), MumbaiITA 6281/MUM/2025[2011-2012]Status: Disposed9 Dec 2025AY 2011-2012
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026