COLGATE-PALMOLIVE (INDIA) LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 15(1)(1), MUMBAI
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “A”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI B.R. BASKARAN & SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEEAxis Enterprises, Mumbai 102, 1st Floor Pals, 1st Road T.P.S IV, Bandra West, Mumbai-400 050 PAN: AAAFA9003D vs Commissioner of Income-tax Appeals, Delhi APPELLANT
PER ANIKESH BANERJEE:
Instant appeal of the assessee was filed against the order of the National
Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi *for brevity, ‘Ld.CIT(A)’) passed under section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for brevity, ‘the Act’), date of order
02/11/2023 for A.Y. 2018-19. The impugned order was emanated from the order of the Ld. Income-tax Officer, Ward 23(1)(1), Mumbaipassed under section 154
read with section 143(3) of the Act, date of order 22/02/2023. 2
Axis Enterprises
The Ld.AR appeared and filed the submission with copy of the Form 2 related to Certificate under sub section (1) of section 92 of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2024 (under the Direct Taxes Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024) dated 28/01/2025. The copy of the letter and Form 2 are placed in the record. In the circumstances, the Ld.AR prayed that the assessee may be allowed to withdraw the appeal, as the department has already issued Form 2 in the said scheme. The Ld.DR did not raise any objection. Therefore, in view of the agreed proposition, we dismiss the appeal filed by the assessee, as withdrawn. 3. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee bearing ITA No. 4838/Mum/2023 is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on 06th day of February, 2025. (B.R. BASKARAN) JUDICIAL MEMBER Mumbai,दिन ांक/Dated: 06/02/2025 Pavanan Copy of the Order forwarded to:
अपील र्थी/The Appellant , 2. प्रदिव िी/ The Respondent. 3. आयकरआयुक्त CIT 4. दवभ गीयप्रदिदनदि, आय.अपी.अदि., मुबांई/DR, ITAT, Mumbai 5. ग र्डफ इल/Guard file.
BY ORDER,
////
(Asstt.