SODEXO INDIA SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 6570/MUM/2024Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 February 2025AY 2019-20Bench: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, HON'BLE (Vice President), SHRI NARENDRA KUMAR BILLAIYA, HON'BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No. 6570 & 6571/Mum/2024 Assessment Year: 2019-20 Sodexo India Services Private Limited 1st Floor, Gemstar Commercial Complex Vs Ramchandra Lane Extension Kanchpada, Malad West Mumbai - 400064 [PAN: AAACR2547Q] अपीलार्थी/ (Appellant) Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax प्रत्यर्थी/ (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri M. A. Gohel, A/R Revenue by : Shri Bhangepatil Pushkaraj Ramesh, Sr. D/R सु1 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal considered the assessee's application and decided to allow the withdrawal of the appeals.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed appeals before the Tribunal. The assessee subsequently applied for withdrawal of these appeals to opt for the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas (DTVSV) Scheme, 2024.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee can withdraw their appeal to opt for the DTVSV Scheme, 2024.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 250

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “G” BENCH, MUMBAI

Before: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, HON’BLE & SHRI NARENDRA KUMAR BILLAIYA, HON’BLE

For Appellant: Shri M. A. Gohel, A/R
Hearing: 13/02/2025Pronounced: 13/02/2025

PER NARENDRA KUMAR BILLAIYA, AM: I.T.A. No. 6570 & 6571/Mum/2024, are two separate appeals by the assessee preferred against two separate orders of the ld.

Addl./JCIT(A)-2, Delhi [hereinafter ‘the ld. CIT(A)], pertaining to AY 2019-20. 2. Before us, the assessee filed the following application for withdrawal of appeals on opting for DTVSV Scheme, 2024:- “To, Date: 17.01.2025 The

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →