RAJESH ASHOK VAJNIK,MUMBAI vs. DCIT 19(3), MUMBAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn due to the assessee's participation in the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme. It granted the assessee liberty to apply for restoration of the appeal if the VSVS application does not materialize or is not accepted.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against a penalty order under Section 270A for Assessment Year 2020-21. The assessee's counsel informed the Tribunal that Form No. 1 under the Direct Taxes Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 had been filed, but Form No. 2 was still awaited from the department.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn given the assessee's participation in the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, while awaiting the completion of the scheme process.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘D’ BENCH
आदेश / O R D E R PER AMIT SHUKLA (J.M): The aforesaid appeal has been filed by the Revenue against order dated 26/09/2024 passed by NFAC, Delhi in relation to the penalty proceedings u/s.270A for A.Y.2020-21.
At the time of hearing the Counsel of the assessee submitted that assessee has already filed Form No. 1 under Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. However, till date Form No. 2 is awaited from the department.
Shri Rajesh Ashok Vajnik 3. We have carefully considered the application of the assessee. Assessee has already filed Form No. 1 under Direct Taxes Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 and Form 2 is awaited from the department. Accordingly, appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn, however, liberty is given to the assessee in case the application for VSVS does not materialize and is not accepted, assessee may file an application for restoration of the appeal.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced on 19th February, 2025.
More judgments on Section 270A
- Kamleshkumar Somalal Bhatt, Himatnagar vs Income Tax Ofifcer, Ward 1, HimatnagarITA 2130/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2125/AHD/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-2020
- Kkg Associates, Visakhapatnam vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 2(1)…ITA 345/VIZ/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Shamsunder Pritesh Malode, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-12(1), HyderabadITA 399/HYD/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Rama Naidu Gutha, Anantapur vs ITO, Ward -1, AnantapurITA 1895/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026