M/S. AAI SHREE ASHAPURAA PARIVAR ASSOCIATION ,MUMBAI vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeals. Finding that the assessee has now submitted the necessary resolution to amend the objects clause, the matters were restored to the file of the CIT(E) for fresh consideration.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust filed an application for registration under Section 12AB of the Act, which was rejected by the CIT along with a separate application for registration under Section 80G. The assessee provided a resolution to amend its objects clause after being confronted with objectionable clauses.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT was justified in rejecting the application for registration under Sections 12A and 80G of the Act, and if the subsequent amendment to the objects clause warrants reconsideration.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 12A,Section 80G,Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii),Section 12AB
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “G” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI NARENDRA KUMAR BILLAIYA, HON’BLE & SHRI SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL, HON’BLE
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
O R D E R
PER NARENDRA KUMAR BILLAIYA, AM: & I.T.A. No. 856/Mum/are two separate appeals preferred by the assessee against two separate orders of ld. CIT (Exemptions), Mumbai, one rejecting the application for registration u/s 12A of the Act and other rejecting application for registration u/s 80G of the Act. 2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the assessee trust filed an application in Form 10AB u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Act seeking registration u/s 12AB of the Act. 3. On perusal of the application read with the trust deed, the ld. CIT(E) was of the belief that the assessee intends to utilize the funds in and outside India. When the assessee was confronted with such objectionable clauses, it stated that it will make necessary corrections in I.T.A. No. 855/Mum/2025 & I.T.A. No. 856/Mum/2025 2 the object clauses with Charity Commission office in due course of time. On finding no documentary evidence, the application was rejected along with rejection of application seeking registration u/s 80G of the Act. 4. Both the appeals before us are barred by limitation. We have gone through the affidavit filed by the assessee seeking condonation of delay and we are satisfied with the reasons for not filing the appeal on time. Delay is condoned. 5. Before us, the ld. Counsel for the assessee filed a resolution to consider and accord approval for alteration to the objects clause of the memorandum of association of the assessee by which, it was proposed to amend the objects clause. 6. As the assessee has filed the resolution wanted by the ld. CIT(E), we deem it fit to restore the impugned issues to the file of the ld. CIT(E). the assessee is directed to furnish the amended memorandum of association with the amended object clause and the ld. CIT(E) is directed to consider the application afresh and decide the issues after affording reasonable and adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee. 7. In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the Court on 18th March, 2025 at Mumbai. (SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026